Co-Constructed Oppositional Stance and Facework in an Office Hour Interaction

dc.authorid Hatime Çiftçi / 0000-0001-7907-6793
dc.contributor.author Çiftçi, Hatime
dc.contributor.author Vásquez, Camilla
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-09T21:41:46Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-09T21:41:46Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department Eğitim Fakültesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü en_US
dc.description.WoSDocumentType Article
dc.description.WoSIndexDate 2020 en_US
dc.description.WoSInternationalCollaboration Uluslararası işbirliği ile yapılan - EVET en_US
dc.description.WoSPublishedMonth Temmuz en_US
dc.description.WoSYOKperiod YÖK - 2019-20 en_US
dc.description.abstract Stance plays a salient role in communicating interpersonal meaning through language use. Understanding stance as co-constructed within dialogic interaction uncovers subtleties of how interlocutors use language to express their subjectivities and thus, negotiate their interpersonal relationship. The notion of face and facework, or relational work (Locher 2004), is therefore relevant to the understanding of stance in interaction. Drawing on Du Bois’ (2007) stance triangle, our study analyzes oppositional stance in a single, extended interaction and shows how two interlocutors in an academic setting jointly construct oppositional stance, each by drawing on their own interpretations. Our analysis indicates that this co-constructed oppositional stance is enacted throughout three broader stages, which we call initiation, negotiation, and resolution. We also demonstrate that expressing oppositional stance is a complex process where interlocutors employ various discourse strategies to express pessimistic evaluation, shifting positionings, and (dis)alignment. Meanwhile, instances of oppositional stance become face-maintaining and face-challenging at different stages in which directness and indirectness are variably employed. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Çiftçi, H., & Vásquez, C. (May 05, 2020). Co-constructed oppositional stance and facework in an office hour interaction. Journal of Politeness Research, (16). 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0013 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1515/pr-2017-0013
dc.identifier.issn 1612-5681
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85086869855
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11779/1338
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0013
dc.identifier.volume 16 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000547378900002
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.institutionauthor Çiftçi, Hatime
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher De Gruyter en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Politeness Research en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Epistemic stance en_US
dc.subject Affective stance en_US
dc.subject Interactional sociolinguistics en_US
dc.subject Facework en_US
dc.subject Oppositional stance en_US
dc.title Co-Constructed Oppositional Stance and Facework in an Office Hour Interaction en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: