Physicians’ Ethical Concerns About Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: a Qualitative Study: “the Final Decision Should Rest With a Human”

dc.authorid Tuna Çakar / 0000-0001-8594-7399
dc.authorscopusid 57517492200
dc.authorscopusid 59467111200
dc.authorscopusid 58644537100
dc.authorscopusid 56329345400
dc.authorscopusid 59466282200
dc.authorscopusid 57814866500
dc.authorscopusid 59466560000
dc.contributor.author Kahraman, F.
dc.contributor.author Aktas, A.
dc.contributor.author Bayrakceken, S.
dc.contributor.author Çakar, T.
dc.contributor.author Tarcan, H.S.
dc.contributor.author Bayram, B.
dc.contributor.author Ulman, Y.I.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-05T18:25:03Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-05T18:25:03Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
dc.description.PublishedMonth Kasım en_US
dc.description.abstract Background/aim: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the capability of computational systems to perform tasks that require human-like cognitive functions, such as reasoning, learning, and decision-making. Unlike human intelligence, AI does not involve sentience or consciousness but focuses on data processing, pattern recognition, and prediction through algorithms and learned experiences. In healthcare including neuroscience, AI is valuable for improving prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance. Methods: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the acceptability of AI in Medicine (AIIM) and to elucidate any technical and scientific, as well as social and ethical issues involved. Twenty-five doctors from various specialties were carefully interviewed regarding their views, experience, knowledge, and attitude toward AI in healthcare. Results: Content analysis confirmed the key ethical principles involved: confidentiality, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Honesty was the least invoked principle. A thematic analysis established four salient topic areas, i.e., advantages, risks, restrictions, and precautions. Alongside the advantages, there were many limitations and risks. The study revealed a perceived need for precautions to be embedded in healthcare policies to counter the risks discussed. These precautions need to be multi-dimensional. Conclusion: The authors conclude that AI should be rationally guided, function transparently, and produce impartial results. It should assist human healthcare professionals collaboratively. This kind of AI will permit fairer, more innovative healthcare which benefits patients and society whilst preserving human dignity. It can foster accuracy and precision in medical practice and reduce the workload by assisting physicians during clinical tasks. AIIM that functions transparently and respects the public interest can be an inspiring scientific innovation for humanity. Copyright © 2024 Kahraman, Aktas, Bayrakceken, Çakar, Tarcan, Bayram, Durak and Ulman. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship University Research Fund; ABAPKO, (2019/03/06) en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428396
dc.identifier.issn 2296-2565
dc.identifier.pmid 39664534
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85211587125
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428396
dc.identifier.volume 12 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001373838600001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.institutionauthor Çakar, Tuna
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers Media SA en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Frontiers in Public Health en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Artificial Intelligence en_US
dc.subject Decision-Making en_US
dc.subject Ethics en_US
dc.subject Healthcare en_US
dc.subject Medicine en_US
dc.subject Qualitative Research en_US
dc.title Physicians’ Ethical Concerns About Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: a Qualitative Study: “the Final Decision Should Rest With a Human” en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files